Flippin' bits
I got curious about what kind of traffic I would get by bitsquatting some of the top-visited domain names (eg. google.com). It was also an excuse to write some bad CL :D, forthwith:
(deftype octet () '(unsigned-byte 8)) (defun str-to-octets (str) (let* ((len (length str)) (octets (make-array len :element-type 'octet))) (loop for index from 0 below len do (setf (aref octets index) (char-int (char str index)))) octets)) (defun octets-to-str (octets) (let* ((len (length octets)) (str (make-string len))) (loop for index from 0 below len do (setf (aref str index) (code-char (aref octets index)))) str)) (defun bit-flips (url) (let* ((out-len (* (length url) 8)) (out (make-array out-len))) (loop for index from 0 below out-len do (setf (aref out index) (string-to-octets url))) (loop for out-index from 0 below out-len do (multiple-value-bind (char-index bit-index) (floor out-index 8) (setf (ldb (byte 1 bit-index) (aref (aref out out-index) char-index)) (if (equal (ldb (byte 1 bit-index) (aref (aref out out-index) char-index)) 0) 1 0)))) (map 'list #'octets-to-str out))) (defun valid-domain (str) (loop for letter across str always (and (lower-case-p letter) (standard-char-p letter))))
Since a valid domain name has to be a subset of ascii (so unicode-containing domain names have to be punycode-encoded), we filter out anything that's not [a-z0-9-], and yes we do that lazily with #'standard-char-p.
So what do the bit-flipped alternatives to .com look like?
>> (sort (remove-if-not #'valid-domain (bit-flips "com")) #'string<) ("aom" "bom" "cgm" "ckm" "cmm" "cnm" "coe" "coi" "col" "coo" "gom" "kom" "som")
I really miss Common Lisp, if only I could convince someone to pay me to write it. It'd be better than this I swear :D
Well I'm not too sure what it would take to register google.gom, so I think I'll stick to the domain name without the TLD.
>> (sort (remove-if-not #'valid-domain (bit-flips "google")) #'string<) ("coogle" "eoogle" "foogle" "ggogle" "gkogle" "gmogle" "gnogle" "goggle" "gokgle" "gomgle" "gongle" "goocle" "gooele" "goofle" "googde" "googhe" "googla" "googld" "googlg" "googlm" "googlu" "googme" "googne" "gooole" "goowle" "ooogle" "woogle")
Absolutely all of those are registered. Couldn't be bothered to automate the WHOIS lookup so I did it manually. I tried some of the other top-visited domains, even tiktok. It's clear either these companies took the threat of bitsquatting seriously and registered them, or some other enterprising entities are actively registering them for whatever purposes. Maybe people just like me experimenting.